Key legal question
Whether the appeal against the cantonal order restoring suspensive effect is admissible
Extracted holding
The appeal is inadmissible because the challenged ruling concerns a provisional measure and the appellant did not invoke or substantiate any constitutional violation.
Extracted reasoning
Orders granting or withdrawing suspensive effect are treated as provisional measures under Art. 98 LTF. In such cases, only constitutional rights may be raised, and they must be specifically alleged and reasoned under Art. 106(2) LTF. That requirement was not met.