Key legal question
Whether the appeal was admissible despite non-payment of the advance on costs within the extended deadline.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because the required advance on costs was not paid in time.
Extracted reasoning
After the refusal of legal aid and the granting of a supplementary time limit, the appellants still failed to pay the advance. Under Art. 62(3) LTF, the consequence is inadmissibility; the matter could be decided in simplified procedure under Art. 108(1)(a) LTF.