Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal complied with the duty to reason under Art. 42 LTF.
Extracted holding
The appeal did not set out in a targeted way how the challenged judgment violated federal law and was therefore manifestly insufficiently reasoned.
Extracted reasoning
A recourant must briefly explain the alleged violation of law and address the reasoning of the lower court. Merely referring to the appellant's health situation does not satisfy Art. 42 LTF.