Key legal question
Whether the appeal was admissible despite non-payment of the court-ordered advance on costs.
Extracted holding
The appeal is inadmissible because the advance on costs was not paid within the additional time limit.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant did not comply with the order of 2010-08-12 requiring payment by 2010-08-30 under threat of inadmissibility; dismissal follows under Art. 62(3) and the simplified procedure of Art. 108(1)(a) and (2) LTF.