Key legal question
Whether the appeal to the Federal Court met the reasoning requirements of Art. 42 LTF.
Extracted holding
The filing did not explain, even briefly, why the challenged judgment was unlawful and merely repeated earlier arguments.
Extracted reasoning
A recourse must contain concise reasons showing how the attacked decision violates federal law; the appellant did not address the inadmissibility reasoning and therefore failed to satisfy Art. 42 paras. 1-2 LTF.