Key legal question
Whether the appeal had to be declared inadmissible because the advance of costs was not paid in time.
Extracted holding
Yes. The appellant failed to pay the advance within the non-extendable deadline, so the appeal was inadmissible.
Extracted reasoning
The second deadline expired on 2010-05-17. The appellant's request of 2010-05-13 gave no sufficient reason for extending the deadline under Art. 47(2) LTF and did not constitute an application for legal aid in this procedure. Under Art. 62(3) LTF, the consequence was inadmissibility, decided in simplified procedure under Art. 108(1)(a) LTF.