Key legal question
Whether the appeal met the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning requirements under Art. 42(1)-(2) LTF.
Extracted holding
No. The filing contained medical assertions but did not show why the lower court's findings were inaccurate or why the judgment violated federal law.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant must state conclusions, reasons, and evidence and briefly explain the alleged legal error. Mere disagreement with the factual assessment is insufficient.