Key legal question
Whether the appeal was admissible despite non-payment of the ordered advance on costs.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to pay the advance within the additional deadline.
Extracted reasoning
After rejecting legal aid for lack of prospects of success, the Court set a further 10-day deadline with an explicit warning; non-payment required inadmissibility under Art. 62(3) LTF and summary treatment under Art. 108(1)(a) LTF.