Key legal question
Whether the appeal was admissible despite the missing copy of the challenged judgment and the failure to comply with the cure order.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because the challenged decision was not attached and the appellant did not remedy the defect within the allotted time.
Extracted reasoning
Under Art. 42(3) and 42(5) LTF, the challenged decision must be enclosed; if missing, the court sets a cure period with a warning. The appellant remained inactive after the court’s letter, so the appeal was manifestly inadmissible under Art. 108(1)(a) LTF.