Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal met the statutory reasoning requirements
Extracted holding
No. The filing contained no formal conclusions and did not explain, even briefly, why the cantonal judgment violated federal law or relied on manifestly incorrect fact-finding.
Extracted reasoning
Under Art. 42 paras. 1-2 LTF, an appeal must state conclusions and reasons; the appellant must address the reasoning of the lower court. The brief did not satisfy these minimum requirements, so non-entry was required under Art. 108 para. 1 let. b LTF.