Key legal question
Whether the appeal met the formal requirements of Art. 42 BGG, especially a proper prayer for relief and legal reasoning against a non-entry decision.
Extracted holding
The appeal did not contain a legally sufficient reasoning because it failed to explain why the lower court should have entered into the case.
Extracted reasoning
For an appeal against a non-entry decision, it is not enough to argue the merits of the underlying dispute; the appellant must specifically address the procedural reason for the non-entry. This was not done here.