Key legal question
Whether the appeal was admissible despite the missing cantonal judgment and defective reasoning
Extracted holding
The appeal was not admissible because the appellant failed to submit the challenged decision and the filing did not meet the formal reasoning requirements.
Extracted reasoning
The court had ordered submission of the lower-court decision under Art. 42(5) BGG; the order was deemed served, but the defect was not cured. The submission also obviously lacked sufficient reasoning under Art. 42(1) and (2) BGG.