Key legal question
Whether the complaint against the cantonal suspension order was admissible under Art. 92 or 93 BGG.
Extracted holding
The complaint was inadmissible because no ground for immediate Federal Court review of an independently notified interim order was shown.
Extracted reasoning
The filing did not allege, and it was not apparent, that the order concerned jurisdiction or recusal, caused irreparable harm, or would otherwise justify immediate review under Art. 93 BGG. It was therefore insufficiently reasoned.