Key legal question
Whether the request for revision of the Federal Supreme Court judgment 6B_378/2012 was admissible.
Extracted holding
The request was inadmissible because the applicant failed to show any ground for revision under Arts. 121 ff. LTF and did not satisfy the substantiation requirements of Art. 42 LTF.
Extracted reasoning
A revision request may only succeed if a statutory revision ground is specifically demonstrated. The applicant merely sought a new review on the merits and did not attack the prior inadmissibility ruling with a cognizable revision argument.