Key legal question
Whether the criminal appeal met the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning requirements under Art. 42 LTF.
Extracted holding
The appeal did not sufficiently explain why the cantonal judgment was unlawful and therefore could not be examined on the merits.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant referred to language-comprehension problems and counsel's defense, but did not address the only cantonal issue, namely alleged arbitrariness in the assessment of evidence, as required by Art. 42 paras. 1 and 2 LTF.