Key legal question
Whether the appeal was admissible despite the appellant's failure to file a copy of the challenged decision after being given a cure period.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because the appellant did not remedy the formal defect within the prescribed time.
Extracted reasoning
Under Art. 42(3) and 42(5) LTF, a copy of the challenged decision must accompany the appeal, and if it is missing the court must grant a deadline to cure the defect with a warning. The appellant, duly warned, still failed to file the required copy, so the appeal had to be disregarded under Art. 108(1)(a) LTF.