Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal met the reasoning requirements under the Federal Supreme Court Act.
Extracted holding
No. The appellant merely presented his own version of the facts and did not show, in a substantiated way, that the lower court's factual findings were arbitrary or otherwise unlawful.
Extracted reasoning
Under Art. 42 paras. 1-2 LTF, the appeal must explain briefly how the contested decision violates the law. Departure from the facts found below requires a specific showing of arbitrariness or unlawful fact-finding, which was absent.