Key legal question
Whether the complaint met the Federal Supreme Court's substantiation requirements.
Extracted holding
No. The appellant addressed only the merits and did not explain why the cantonal court's finding of insufficient reasoning was unlawful or arbitrary.
Extracted reasoning
The challenged cantonal decision concerned only formal inadmissibility. Since the federal complaint did not engage with that reasoning, it failed to satisfy Art. 42(2) BGG and could not be heard in summary procedure under Art. 108 BGG.