Appeal withdrawn; case struck from the roll

6B_328/2010Federal Supreme Court / Criminal DivisionMay 27, 2010Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant withdrew her appeal to the Federal Supreme Court by letter dated 24 May 2010. The Court took note of the withdrawal, struck the case from the roll under Art. 32 para. 2 LTF, and ordered that no judicial costs be charged. The order was communicated to the parties and the cantonal criminal chamber.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 32 al. 2 LTF; withdrawal of the appeal before the Federal Supreme Court; upon express withdrawal, the Court takes note and strikes the case from the roll. The proceeding is terminated without examination on the merits, and costs may be waived where the order so provides.

Full text

{T 0/2}
6B_328/2010

Ordonnance du 27 mai 2010
Cour de droit pénal

Composition
M. le Juge Favre, Président.
Greffier: M. Oulevey.

Participants à la procédure
X.________,
recourante,

contre

Ministère public de l'État de Fribourg, case postale, 1700 Fribourg,
intimé.

Objet
Ordonnance de classement (vol),

recours contre l'arrêt du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Fribourg, Chambre pénale, du 14 avril 2010.

Considérant:
que, par lettre du 24 mai 2010, X.________ a déclaré retirer le recours qu'elle avait interjeté au Tribunal fédéral contre l'arrêt rendu le 14 avril 2010 par la Chambre pénale du Tribunal cantonal de l'État de Fribourg dans la cause 502 2010-161,

qu'il sied d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle (art. 32 al. 2 LTF), sans frais.

Par ces motifs, le Président ordonne:

1.
La cause est rayée du rôle.

2.
Il n'est pas prélevé de frais judiciaires.

3.
La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et au Tribunal cantonal de l'État de Fribourg, Chambre pénale.

Lausanne, le 27 mai 2010

Au nom de la Cour de droit pénal
du Tribunal fédéral suisse
Le Président: Le Greffier:

Favre Oulevey

Keywords

withdrawalstriking from the rolljudicial costscriminal appealprocedure

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be recorded as withdrawn and the case struck from the docket.

Extracted holding

The Court took note of the withdrawal and struck the case from the roll.

Extracted reasoning

Because the appellant expressly withdrew the appeal by letter of 24 May 2010, the Court entered the withdrawal and removed the case from the docket under Art. 32 para. 2 LTF.

Key legal question

Whether judicial costs should be charged despite the withdrawal.

Extracted holding

No judicial costs were imposed.

Extracted reasoning

The order states that the case is struck from the roll without costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.