Key legal question
Whether the criminal complaint to the Federal Supreme Court was sufficiently reasoned.
Extracted holding
The complaint did not address the decisive issue and therefore failed to meet the reasoning requirements.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant did not contest the cantonal court's non-entry decision; despite being invited to supplement the filing, he did not do so. Under Art. 42(2) and Art. 106(2) BGG, the appeal lacked sufficient reasoning and could not be examined under Art. 108 BGG.