6B_210/2012•Withdrawal of criminal appeal; case struck from the roll
6B_210/2012Federal Supreme Court / Criminal DivisionApr 10, 2012Withdrawn
Extracted by Omnilex
The appellant withdrew her criminal appeal to the Federal Supreme Court by letter of 3 April 2012. The single judge took note of the withdrawal, ordered the case struck from the roll, and decided that no judicial costs would be charged. The order was communicated to the parties and to the cantonal criminal appeal court.
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF; withdrawal of the appeal before the Federal Supreme Court: where the appellant withdraws the recourse, the court takes note thereof and strikes the case from the roll without ruling on the merits. In the absence of a merits decision, the proceedings are terminated by order; costs may be waived according to the dispositive terms of the order.
{T 0/2}
6B_210/2012
Ordonnance du 10 avril 2012
Cour de droit pénal
Composition
M. le Juge Schneider, Juge unique.
Greffière: Mme Gehring.
Participants à la procédure
X.________,
recourante,
contre
Ministère public central du canton de Vaud, avenue de Longemalle 1, 1020 Renens VD,
intimé.
Objet
Lésions corporelles simples,
recours contre l'arrêt de la Cour d'appel pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 6 mars 2012.
Considérant:
que, par lettre datée du 3 avril 2012, X.________ a déclaré retirer le recours qu'elle a interjeté au Tribunal fédéral contre l'arrêt de la Cour d'appel pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 6 mars 2012,
qu'il sied d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle (art. 32 al. 2 LTF), sans frais.
Par ces motifs, le Juge unique prononce:
1.
La cause est rayée du rôle.
2.
Il n'est pas prélevé de frais judiciaires.
3.
La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et à la Cour d'appel pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud.
Lausanne, le 10 avril 2012
Au nom de la Cour de droit pénal
du Tribunal fédéral suisse
Le Juge unique: Schneider
La Greffière: Gehring
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the federal criminal appeal should be dismissed following the appellant's withdrawal.
The court took formal notice of the withdrawal and struck the case from the roll.
Once the appeal was withdrawn by letter, there was no need to decide the merits; the case had to be removed from the docket under Art. 32(2) LTF.
Whether court costs should be charged after the withdrawal.
No judicial costs were levied.
The order expressly states that the matter is struck from the roll without costs.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.