Key legal question
Whether the complaint met the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning requirements and was admissible
Extracted holding
The complaint did not explain any violation of federal law and therefore failed to satisfy the statutory reasoning requirements; the Court would not enter into it.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant did not show what in the cantonal decision could violate Swiss law within the meaning of Art. 95 BGG. The submission therefore failed under Art. 42(2) and Art. 106(2) BGG, so non-entry was ordered under Art. 108 BGG.