Key legal question
Whether the complaint against the cantonal non-entry decision met the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning requirements.
Extracted holding
No. The appellant did not substantiate or prove the asserted reasons for missing the deadline, so the filing lacked sufficient reasoning.
Extracted reasoning
The alleged workload and private difficulties were merely asserted. Because the complaint did not develop or document these claims, the court could not examine them and the filing was inadmissible under Art. 108 BGG.