Key legal question
Whether the constitutional complaint is admissible despite non-payment of the ordered advance of costs.
Extracted holding
No. The appellant failed to pay the advance or prove that the required sum had been debited from her postal or bank account, so the complaint was inadmissible.
Extracted reasoning
After the court set and then extended the deadline for the advance of costs, the appellant still did not comply. Under Art. 48(4) LTF and Art. 62(3) LTF, failure to pay leads to inadmissibility.