Key legal question
Admissibility of the constitutional appeal/subsidiary constitutional complaint
Extracted holding
The filing was inadmissible because the appellant did not show any constitutional violation and did not establish the requirements for treating the matter as a case of principle.
Extracted reasoning
The amount in dispute was below CHF 30,000, so the filing had to be treated as a subsidiary constitutional complaint. The appellant failed to specify any constitutional rights infringed, as required by the Federal Supreme Court Act.