Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal was admissible despite lacking any legal reasoning.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because it contained no motivation meeting the Federal Supreme Court's requirements, and the defect could not be cured after expiry of the non-extendable appeal period.
Extracted reasoning
Art. 42(2) and 106(2) LTF require substantiated reasoning; once the appeal deadline has expired and cannot be extended under Art. 47(1) LTF, the deficiency cannot be remedied.