Key legal question
Whether the appeal had to be declared inadmissible because the court cost advance was not paid on time.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because the required advance of costs was not furnished within the extended deadline.
Extracted reasoning
The advance of costs ordered on 18 November 2009 and again extended on 8 December 2009 was not paid in due time, triggering inadmissibility under Art. 62(3) LTF.