Key legal question
Whether the appeal against the cantonal decision was timely filed.
Extracted holding
The appeal was filed after expiry of the statutory appeal period and was therefore inadmissible.
Extracted reasoning
The decision was served on 2013-12-03, and the appellant handed the appeal to the post only on 2014-01-17. The suspension of deadlines under Art. 46(1)(c) BGG did not apply because the case concerned protective measures within the meaning of Art. 98 BGG, to which Art. 46(2) BGG excludes deadline suspension.