Key legal question
Whether the applicant established any ground for revision under Art. 121 lit. b, Art. 122, or Art. 123 para. 1 BGG.
Extracted holding
No revision ground was shown; the request was rejected.
Extracted reasoning
Art. 122 BGG was inapplicable because no ECtHR judgment existed. The court saw no indication that more or less than requested had been awarded, and nothing suggesting a criminal offense had influenced the non-entry judgment. The remaining invoked grounds therefore also failed.