Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal was sufficiently reasoned to be admissible
Extracted holding
No. The filing contained no proper conclusions and did not show any constitutional violation by the cantonal court.
Extracted reasoning
Under Art. 42 LTF and, for a subsidiary constitutional appeal, Art. 116 LTF, the appellant must state conclusions and explain briefly which rights were violated. The letter did neither, so the Court could not enter into the merits.