Key legal question
Whether the constitutional appeal was admissible despite non-payment of the ordered advance on costs.
Extracted holding
No. The appeal was inadmissible because the required advance on costs was not paid within the extended deadlines.
Extracted reasoning
The court noted that the advance on costs ordered under Art. 62(3) LTF was not paid within the time limits set, which made the appeal inadmissible under Art. 62(3) LTF and Art. 108(1)(a) LTF.