Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal was sufficiently reasoned under Art. 42(2) LTF.
Extracted holding
No. The appellant did not show how the challenged decision violated federal law and failed to substantiate arbitrariness in the application of Art. 300 LPC gen.
Extracted reasoning
The complaint attacked the first-instance proceedings and alleged denial of being heard, but did not identify the essential argument or explain the alleged legal error; the motivation was manifestly insufficient.