Key legal question
Whether the appeal was admissible despite non-payment of the required advance on costs.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to pay the requested advance within the deadlines granted.
Extracted reasoning
After the initial deadline and an additional deadline under Art. 62(3) LTF, the advance remained unpaid; under Art. 108(1)(a) LTF the court could not enter into the appeal.