Key legal question
Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible despite the missing power of attorney and insufficient reasoning.
Extracted holding
The complaint was not admitted because the requested power of attorney was not filed within the deadline and the submission also failed to meet the reasoning requirements.
Extracted reasoning
The Federal Court had warned that non-compliance would lead to non-entry under Art. 30 Abs. 2 OG. Counsel did not cure the defect, although the letter was collected. The complaint also did not satisfy Art. 90 Abs. 1 lit. b OG.