Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal could challenge the cantonal procedural finding that the 2009 request was an inadmissible reconsideration.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because it did not sufficiently allege arbitrary application of cantonal procedural law or explain any effect of Art. 24 Cst. on that law.
Extracted reasoning
Federal review was limited by Art. 95 and Art. 86 LTF; the appellant attacked only cantonal procedural law but failed to invoke and substantiate arbitrariness under Art. 9 Cst.