Key legal question
Whether the appeal met the formal reasoning requirements for a public-law appeal.
Extracted holding
The appeal did not sufficiently explain why the challenged judgment was unlawful or unconstitutional and therefore did not meet the statutory reasoning requirements.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant merely criticized the judgment in general terms without addressing the reasoning in detail, so the pleading failed to satisfy Art. 42(2) and Art. 106(2) BGG; the defect was manifest and could be dealt with in simplified procedure.