Key legal question
Admissibility of the appeal for failure to comply with the reasoning requirements
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because it did not set out, in a legally sufficient manner, why the challenged judgment violated the law or the Constitution.
Extracted reasoning
The appellant did not state any admissible ground of appeal, did not engage with the lower court’s reasoning, and therefore failed to satisfy Art. 42(2) and Art. 106(2) BGG; summary procedure under Art. 108(1)(b) BGG was applicable.