Key legal question
Whether the appeal was admissible despite the appellants' failure to file the challenged decision after being ordered to do so.
Extracted holding
The appeal could not be examined on the merits and was inadmissible.
Extracted reasoning
The appellants did not produce the impugned decision within the set time limit, despite a warning under Art. 42(3) and (5) LTF; therefore the filing could not be considered and summary treatment under Art. 108(1)(a) LTF was appropriate.