Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal met the statutory reasoning requirements.
Extracted holding
No. The appeal did not identify any legal provision or engage with the challenged reasoning, so it failed the required substantiation standards.
Extracted reasoning
Because the cantonal decision applied procedural rules on legal aid, only fundamental-rights violations could be invoked before the Federal Supreme Court. The filing contained no legal argument and no discussion of the appealed decision, thus not satisfying Arts. 42(2) and 106(2) LTF.