Key legal question
Whether the complaint met the federal pleading requirements for an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
Extracted holding
The filing did not state any admissible ground and failed to show, in a comprehensible way, how the challenged decision violated law or constitutional rights.
Extracted reasoning
Under Art. 42(2) and Art. 106(2) BGG, the appellant must explain briefly and specifically why the decision is unlawful. The submission was unintelligible and therefore manifestly insufficient.