Key legal question
Whether the appeal against the non-prosecution order was admissible and sufficiently reasoned.
Extracted holding
The appeal was inadmissible because it did not meet the formal reasoning requirements and did not show why the prosecutor had wrongly dismissed the complaint.
Extracted reasoning
Under Art. 42 LTF, an appeal must contain requests, reasons, and evidence indications, and must explain the violation complained of. The appellant made no substantive arguments challenging the non-prosecution order and did not demonstrate a violation; the court could therefore decide under the simplified procedure.