Key legal question
Formal requirements for a request for reconsideration and the scope of the dispute
AGVE_2006_54•AGVE_2006_54 – Entscheid Obergericht / Verwaltungsgericht / 1. Kammer vom 31.12.2006
AGVE_2006_54Administrative Court / Chamber 1Dec 31, 2006
Extracted by Omnilex
The provided excerpt is a table-of-contents style list from AGVE 2006, not a full decision. It mentions several administrative-law topics, including reconsideration, third-party standing, recusal, review of planning zones, the right to reply, and claims for the canton’s so-called base amount, but does not contain the underlying facts, parties, holdings, or dispositive outcome.
Planungszone. - Kognition des Verwaltungsgerichts bei der Überprüfung von Planungszonen, welche der Regierungsrat gemäss § 29 Abs. 1 BauG erlassen hat (Erw. I/2). - Kein Recht auf Replik (Erw. I/4).
2006 Verwaltungsrechtspflege 277 XII. Verwaltungsrechtspflege
52 Formelle Anforderungen an eine Wiedererwägung.
Extracted by Omnilex
Formal requirements for a request for reconsideration and the scope of the dispute
Formal requirements for administrative decisions and rulings
Standing of third parties bringing an appeal in favour of the addressee of the order
Recusal of a municipal councillor acting ex officio as president of the forestry commission while the forestry enterprise submitted an offer to the municipality
Review standard of the administrative court for planning zones ordered by the government council under § 29 para. 1 BauG
Whether there is a right to reply
Jurisdiction and applicable procedural rules for asserting the so-called base amount from the Canton of Aargau
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.