projects

Administrative procedure: reconsideration, standing, recusal, planning zones

AGVE_2006_53Administrative Court / Chamber 1Dec 31, 2006

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The excerpt lists several administrative-law headnotes from Aargau case law. It addresses reconsideration requirements, third-party standing, recusal of a municipal councillor with a dual role, the Administrative Court’s review power over planning zones, the absence of a right to reply, and jurisdiction and procedure for claiming the cantonal 'Sockelbetrag'. No factual or dispositive details of the individual cases are provided in the excerpt.

Omnilex headnote

Reconsideration proceedings must satisfy formal requirements as to subject matter and form; the admissibility and legal interest of third-party complaints are assessed with regard to the addressee’s protection. A municipal authority member may be required to withdraw where a dual office and participation in a competing offer create an appearance of bias. In reviewing planning zones enacted by the cantonal government, the Administrative Court’s cognition is determined by the applicable planning statute. There is no general right to a reply unless procedurally guaranteed. Jurisdiction and the applicable procedural regime for cantonal basic-payment claims depend on the specific statutory basis and related procedural law.

Full text

2006 Verwaltungsrechtspflege 277 XII. Verwaltungsrechtspflege

52 Formelle Anforderungen an eine Wiedererwägung.

  • Streitgegenstand; Form der Wiedererwägung (Erw. I/2-3).
  • Formelle Anforderungen an Verfügungen und Entscheide (Erw. II/3). vgl. AGVE 2006 43 225 53 Legitimation Dritter.
  • Legitimation im Falle einer Drittbeschwerde zugunsten des Verfügungsadressaten (Erw. I/3).
  • Ausstand eines Gemeinderats, der von Amtes wegen Präsident der Forstbetriebskommission Y. ist und dessen Forstbetrieb Y. für den Flurstrassenunterhalt seiner Einwohnergemeinde ein Angebot eingereicht hat (Erw. II/4.1). vgl. AGVE 2006 39 204 54 Planungszone.
  • Kognition des Verwaltungsgerichts bei der Überprüfung von Planungszonen, welche der Regierungsrat gemäss § 29 Abs. 1 BauG erlassen hat (Erw. I/2).
  • Kein Recht auf Replik (Erw. I/4). vgl. AGVE 2006 30 131 55 Geltendmachung des sog. "Sockelbetrages" vom Kanton Aargau.
  • Zuständigkeit (Erw. I/1).
  • Anwendbare Verfahrensvorschriften (Erw. I/2). vgl. AGVE 2006 51 261

Keywords

administrative procedurereconsiderationstandingrecusalplanning zonereplyjurisdictionprocedural rules

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Formal requirements and subject matter of reconsideration proceedings

Key legal question

Third-party standing in support of the addressee of the administrative order

Key legal question

Recusal of a municipal councillor who also presides ex officio over a forestry commission bidding for municipal road maintenance work

Key legal question

Scope of review by the Administrative Court over planning zones ordered by the cantonal government

Key legal question

Right to file a reply in the administrative proceedings

Key legal question

Jurisdiction and applicable procedural rules for asserting the cantonal 'Sockelbetrag'

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.