In a sale by sample, the person to whom the sample was entrusted is not obliged to prove that the sample he presented is identical with the one received; his personal assurance to the court is sufficient, even where the sample presented has altered in form since delivery, provided that such alteration was a necessary consequence of the examination made of the sample.
In any event the other party is entitled to prove that the sample is not the same one.
If the sample has been spoiled or been destroyed while in the possession of the buyer, even if he was not at fault, the onus is not on the seller to prove that the object conforms with the sample, but on the buyer to prove the contrary.
0 commentaries
No commentaries are available for this article yet.
Programmatic access
API and MCP access with filters for source type, region, court, legal area, article, citation, language, and date.