Against a claim deriving from an instrument to order, the obligor may plead only such defences as contest the validity of the instrument or arise from the instrument itself and those available to him personally against the respective obligee.
Defences based on the direct relations between the obligor and a former bearer are admissible where the bearer intentionally acted to the detriment of the obligor when acquiring the security.
0 commentaries
No commentaries are available for this article yet.
Programmatic access
API and MCP access with filters for source type, region, court, legal area, article, citation, language, and date.