us-uspto-mpep-archived-e2r3_300•300
Printed page 1
Printed page 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
# Chapter 300 Ownership and Assignment :301 Assignability of Patents and Applications 302 Effect of Recording 303 Endersing Assignments on Pending Applications 304 Conflicting Subject Matter in Two Applications of Same Inventor, One of Which Is Assigned 305 Different Inventors, Common Ownership 305.01 Unclaimed Subject Matter in the Earlier Filed Application 305.02 Claimed Subject Matter the Same or Not Pat- entably Different 305.02 (a) Rejection of One Application on the Other 306 Assignment of Division, Continuation, Substi- tute, and Continuation-in-Part in Relation to Parent Case 307 Issue to Assignee 308 Notice of Allowance When Assigned 309 Restriction Upon Employees of Patent Office ## 301 Assignability of Patents and Appli- cations Extract from 35 U. S. C. 261. A certificate of ac- knowledgment under the hand and official seal of a person authorized to administer oaths within the United States, or, in a foreign country, of a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States or an officer authorized to administer oaths whose authority is proved by a certificate of a diplomatie or consular officer of the United States, shall be prima facie evi- dence of the execution of an assignment, grant or conveyance of a patent or application for patent. ## 302 Effect of Recording Extract from 35 U. S. C. 261. An assignment, grant, or conveyance shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser or mortgagee for valuable consideration, without notice, unless it is recorded in the Patent Office within three months from its date or prior to the date of such subsequent purchase or mortgage. ## 303 Endorsing Assignments on Pend- ing Applications The Assignment Branch segregates assign- ments relating to pending applications; and entry clerks from that branch locate the file of the application and endorse on it the name of the assignee. ## 304 Conflicting Subject Matter in Two Applications of Same Inventor, One of Which Is Assigned Where applicant has pending two applica- tions with overlapping subject matter therein, and assigns one of the applications in its en- tirety, which assignment is duly recorded in the Patent Office, the assigned application at once may become a reference against the second ap- plication for all common subject matter dis- closed, irrespective of the dates of filing of the two applications, and also of any subsequent assignment of the second case to another .. ### 305 Different Inventors, Common Ownership Where there is a common assignee of two or more applications by different inventors, these applications are subject by reason of their common ownership to treatment in general the same as though they were all the applications of the same inventor that were voluntarily separately filed; see Chapter 800 and In re Stanley et al., 102 USPQ 234. Where the applications disclose and claim patentably different inventions, there being no overlap of claims, or where the earlier filed application has issued as a patent and has be- come a statutory bar before filing of the other application, no problems arise. ### 305.01 Unclaimed Subject Matter in the Earlier Filed Application If the second filed application claims subject matter disclosed but not claimed in the earlier filed application, 35 U. S. C. 102 (e) applies and the earlier filed application is a reference (Section 706.02) unless it is removed (Section 715). #### 305.02 Claimed Subject Matter the Same or Not Patentably Dif- ferent A YATEN Where the applications by different inventors but of common ownership claim the same sub- <!-- PageFooter="Rev. 1, Apr. 1955" --> <!-- PageBreak --> ##### 305.02 (a) <!-- PageHeader="MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE" --> ject matter or subject matter that is not patent- ably different, questions of interference there- between and with third parties are handled as indicated in Section 1101.01 (b). ##### 305.02 (a) Rejection of One Applica- tion on the Other Where the examiner is of the opinion that the several applications are for the same subject matter or subject matter not patentably differ- ent :- I. the claims in the later filed application should be rejected on the claimed subject matter of the earlier filed still pending application ; II. where either application issues as a pat- ent, the other should be rejected thereon. Such rejection cannot be avoided by filing a dis- claimer of the conflicting patent claims. ## 306 Assignment of Division, Contin- uation, Substitute and Continua- tion-in-Part in Relation to Parent Case When a divisional, continuation, or substitute application is ready for allowance, it is sent to the Assignment Branch where the assignment of the original application is applied to the later application, provided the date of the assignment of the original application was before the filing of the later application. In the case of a continuation-in-part, a prior assignment of the original application is not applied as a matter of course to the continua- tion-in-part application because the assignment of the original application gives the assignee only the subject matter common to both ap- plications. However, when a continuation-in- part is ready for allowance, it also is sent to the Assignment Branch to check for any conflict between the assignment of the original applica- tion and the assignment of the continuation-in- part as far as concerns the common subject mat- ter. If such a conflict does exist the Assignment Branch notifies the proper parties that it should be corrected. If the conflict is not corrected the continuation-in-part will issue to the applicant and not to the assignee. ( ## 307 Issue to Assignee For the patent to normally issue to an as- signee, the assignment must be recorded in the Patent Office at a date not later than the day on which the final fee is paid; in the case of an application for reissue, the assignment must be recorded before the case is allowed; in the case of an application for a design patent, the as- signment must be recorded at least ten days before the case is allowed. Irrespective of whether the assignee partici- pates in the prosecution of the application, the patent issues to him unless there are conflicting assignments. ## 308 Notice of Allowance Where Appli- cation Is Assigned In writing the notice of allowance of an ap- plication in which there is an assignment of record, after the name of the applicant, a comma followed by the expression "Assor, etc." should be written. This will serve to notify the addressee that the patent will issue to the assignee. ## 309 Restrictions Upon Employees of Patent Office 35 U. S. C. 4. Restrictions on officers and employees as to interest in patents. Officers and employees of the Patent Office shall be incapable, during the period of their appointments and for one year thereafter, of applying for a patent and of acquiring, directly or indi- rectly, except by inheritance or bequest, any patent or any right or interest in any patent, issued or to be issued by the Office. In patents applied for thereafter they shall not be entitled to any priority date earlier than one year after the termination of their appoint- ment. <!-- PageFooter="Rev. İ, April 1955" --> € Il 9901EL
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.