rr-02-3.pdf

us-irs-revenue-rulings-rr-02-3rr-02-3.pdfGuidance

Abrir fonte

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing.

This collection currently includes the publisher’s available advance-release directory. Historical bulletin renditions are discovered separately; an advance-release record alone does not certify the collection archive complete.

<!-- PageHeader="CASE MIS Number: RR-125834-00" -->
<!-- PageHeader="Part I" -->

Section 106 .- Contributions by Employer to Accident and Health Plans

(Also Section 125 - Cafeteria Plans and Section 105 - Amounts Received Under Accident
and Health Plans)

Rev. Rul. 2002-3

ISSUE

Whether, under the facts described, the exclusions from gross income under
§§106(a) or 105(b) of the Internal Revenue Code apply to reimbursements by an employer
to employees for salary reduction amounts used to pay for health insurance premiums.

FACTS

Employer M provides health coverage for its employees through a group health
insurance policy. The coverage constitutes accident or health coverage for purposes of the
exclusion for employer-provided accident or health coverage under §106(a).

M has a payroll arrangement under which employees' salaries are reduced, and M
applies the salary reduction amounts to the payment of the health insurance premiums for
the employees. Thus, employees receive lower salaries in exchange for employer-provided
health coverage. In addition, M makes "reimbursement" payments to employees with
respect to the health insurance premiums in amounts that cause employees' after-tax pay
from M to be the same as what it would have been if there were no salary reduction and no
"reimbursement" payments. M takes the position that both the salary reduction and the
"reimbursement" payments are excluded from gross income of employees and are not
subject to Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) or Federal Unemployment Tax Act
(FUTA) taxes.

The salary reduction used to pay for health insurance premiums under M's payroll
arrangement could be done with or without employee elections. For example, M could
make a unilateral decision to reduce employees' salaries and use those amounts to provide
health insurance to the employees. Alternatively, M could offer employees the choice under

<!-- PageBreak -->

a §125 cafeteria plan to reduce their salaries in order to receive employer-provided health
insurance.

# LAW AND ANALYSIS

In general, §106(a) provides that gross income of an employee does not include
employer-provided coverage under an accident or health plan. Under §106(a), an
employee may exclude premiums for accident or health insurance coverage that are paid by
an employer. Also, under §105(b), an employee may exclude amounts received through
employer-provided accident or health insurance if those amounts are paid to reimburse
expenses incurred by the employee for medical care (of the employee, the employee's
spouse, or the employee's dependents) for personal injuries or sickness. To the extent
amounts are excluded from gross income under §105(b) or 106(a), they are also excluded
from income tax withholding under §3401. In addition, amounts paid to reimburse expenses
incurred by the employee for medical care (of the employee, the employee's spouse, or the
employee's dependents) for personal injuries or sickness are also excluded from FICA and
FUTA taxes under §§3121(a) and 3306(b).

Under §125, an employer may establish a cafeteria plan that permits an employee to
choose among two or more benefits, consisting of cash (generally, salary) and qualified
benefits, including accident or health coverage. Pursuant to §125, the amount of an
employee's salary reduction applied to purchase such coverage is not included in gross
income, even though it is available to the employee and the employee could have chosen to
receive cash instead. If an employee elects salary reduction pursuant to §125, the
coverage is excludable from gross income under §106 as employer-provided accident or
health coverage.

Rev. Rul. 61-146, 1961-2 C.B. 25, provides that the §106 exclusion applies to an
employer's reimbursement of an employee for individual accident and health insurance
premiums paid by the employee to an insurer if (1) the employer has an accident and health
plan under which it permits such reimbursements and (2) any reimbursement is of premiums
actually paid by the employee.

Under the rationale of Rev. Rul. 61-146, §106 allows an employee to exclude
employer reimbursements for health insurance premiums, but only if those premiums are
actually paid by the employee. Under both alternative arrangements described above,
when M applies the amount of employees' salary reduction to pay health insurance
premiums, the premium payments are paid by M, not the employees, and are excludable
from the employees' gross income under §106 because they are paid by M. Although the

<!-- PageBreak -->

§106 exclusion applies to the health insurance premiums paid by M, there is no employee-
paid premium for M to "reimburse", and therefore the reimbursement payments that M
makes to employees are not excluded from gross income under §106. Similarly, the
reimbursement payments are not excluded from gross income under §105 because they do
not reimburse employees for expenses incurred for medical care. Accordingly, the
reimbursement payments are not excluded from income tax withholding under §3401. In
addition, because the reimbursement payments are not reimbursements of expenses
incurred for medical care, they are not excluded from FICA taxes under §3121(a) or FUTA
taxes under §3306(b).

If the premium payments were instead actually paid by the employees out of the
employees' salaries, the salary amounts from which the payments were made would not be
excludable from the employees' gross income, but any payments by M to reimburse the
employees for the premium payments would be excludable under section 106.

# HOLDING

The exclusions from gross income under §§106(a) and 105(b) do not apply to
amounts that an employer pays to employees to reimburse the employees for amounts paid
by an employer for health insurance coverage that are excluded from gross income under
§106(a) (including salary reduction amounts pursuant to a cafeteria plan under §125 that
are applied to pay for such coverage). Accordingly, the reimbursement amounts that the
employer pays to the employees are included in the employees' gross income under §61
and are subject to employment taxes under §§3401, 3121(a), and 3306(b).

# EFFECT ON OTHER REVENUE RULINGS

## Rev. Rul. 61-146 is distinguished.

## DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal author of this Revenue Ruling is Janet A. Laufer of the Office of Division
Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). For further
information regarding this Revenue Ruling, contact her at (202) 622-6080 (not a toll-free
call).

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.