us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-a101bfbab843ae0419153cdbea631e53•2507004 Informal Interpretation
2507004 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-a101bfbab843ae0419153cdbea631e532507004 Informal InterpretationGuidance
It’s our preference that you list all codes relevant to the same acquisition in one row (i.e., the first example in your email).
Question
I’m looking for assistance with how to present information in the “Prior Acquisitions” section.
For prior acquisitions in which the previously acquired companies with sales overlap in multiple NAICS Codes, how should these be listed? Should we list all codes relevant to the same acquisition in one row or separate the codes and list them in ascending numerical order?
| Overlapping 6-Digit NAICS Code and Description or Overlap Product or Service Description | Acquired Entity and Former HQ Address | Transaction Type | Consummation Date |
|---|---|---|---|
111111 222222 | ABC, Inc. | Asset Acquisition | May 1, 2025 |
| 111111 | XYZ, Inc. | Asset Acquisition | February 1, 2025 |
OR
| Overlapping 6-Digit NAICS Code and Description or Overlap Product or Service Description | Acquired Entity and Former HQ Address | Transaction Type | Consummation Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 111111 | ABC, Inc. | Asset Acquisition | May 1, 2025 |
| 111111 | XYZ, Inc. | Asset Acquisition | February 1, 2025 |
| 222222 | ABC, Inc. | Asset Acquisition | May 1, 2025 |
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.