State Of Washington, Respondent V. Daniel Albert Belleque, Appellant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
DANIEL ALBERT BELLEQUE,
Appellant.
No. 73034-7-1
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
FILED: 	JAN 1 9 2016
Per Curiam — Daniel Belleque appeals his convictions for burglary in the 	K
second degree and theft in the third degree. 	Belleque contends, and the State 	Ln
concedes, that he was denied his constitutional right to self-representation. 	See State
v. Madsen, 168 Wn.2d 496, 229 P.3d 714 (2010). We accept the State's concession,©?
-E~
reverse Belleque's convictions, and remand the matter for a new trial.
In his statement of additional grounds for review, Belleque contends that the trial
court violated his CrR 3.3 speedy trial rights. 	But his conclusory allegations provide no
basis for appellate review. 	See RAP 10.10(c). Because we reverse Belleque's
convictions and remand for a new trial, the remaining allegations in his statement of
additional grounds are moot.
Reversed and remanded.
FOR THE COURT:
V CX