77647-9•State Of Washington, Respondent V. Douglas Alexander Richards, Appellant
State Of Washington, Respondent V. Douglas Alexander Richards, Appellant
77647-9Washctapp10 de set. de 2018
Texto completo
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) 111%, c, ) No. 77647-9-1 —4= Respondent, ) ) DIVISION ONE fyl -0 rnCZ 0-11 >-- DOUGLAS ALEXANDER RICHARDS, ) ) ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION SEP 1 0 2018 cm 2 . 3P-um CA m =r- , Appellant. .) FILED:, PER CURIAM — Douglas Richards appeals from the judgment and sentence entered after he pleaded guilty to felony murder in the second degree based on assault. See RCW 9A.32.050(1)(b). Our Supreme Court has held that at the time of the charged crime in April 1980, felony murder could not be predicated on assault. In re Pers. Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn. 2d 602, 616, 56 P.3d 981 (2002). The holding in Andress is retroactive. In re Pers. Restraint of Hinton, 152 Wn. 2d 853, 861, 100 P.3d 801 (2004). The State of Washington concedes that in light of the date of the charged crime, the trial court lacked authority to accept Richards plea or impose sentence. See Hinton, 152 Wn.2d at 861 (defendant cannot agree to Plead guilty to nonexistent crime). We accept the State's concession. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is vacated and the matter remanded for further proceedings. See Andress, 147 Wn.2d at 616. Vacated and remanded for further proceedings: FOR THE COURT: w 4411.4.44)1
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.